View table: Confirmation
More actions
Table structure:
- page - Page
- confirmed_by - String
- date - Date
- cards - String (allowed values: 8 GB · 10 GB · both)
- result - String (allowed values: Reproduced · Partly reproduced · Did not reproduce)
- numbers - Text
- notes - Wikitext
This table has 52 rows altogether.
This table is defined by the template Confirmation.
| _pageName | page | confirmed by | date | cards | result | numbers | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (CurtisAccelerate TC-MoE)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (CurtisAccelerate TC-MoE) | anon33anon | 2026-10-20 | 8 GB | Did not reproduce | None. | Tried to replicate the recipe on 2026-10-20 and found some pieces were not open source at the time. The repo has been updated since (last commit 2026-10-28). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @anon33anon, 2026-10-20 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (GNmac)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (GNmac) | darkmaniac7 | 2026-10-27 | 8 GB | Reproduced | TP4: one user code 244, structured 212, prose 136 tok/s; 8 users 522 / 425 / 346 aggregate; prefill 2.0k to 2.6k tok/s; KV pool 1.4M at 262K context. | Four cards of an 8-card box (Gen2 x16, P2P verified on all pairs), served beside another 4-card instance; 1,024-token answers, his own bench. Smoke test passed (arithmetic, tool call, image). Speed matches the published release closely. Found the long-context copy defect listed on the page (85% of named paths wrong on 75k to 92k-token turns). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-10-28 (lab notes) |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (GNmac)/Confirmation 2 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (GNmac) | mountains1605 | 2026-10-23 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | Single stream maybe 10% below GLM 5.3 Flash on the same cards; first load about 8 minutes or more. | Four cards on PCIe Gen2 x4 links: PP4 did not work well, TP4 with P2P worked and never felt slow. Quality a bit above GLM 5.3 Flash but less consistent; later he preferred the Morrowmake build for prefill and quality. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @mountains1605, 2026-10-22 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake) | mountains1605 | 2026-10-27 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | No tok/s posted. Roughly similar speed to the GNmac build he ran before, better quality. | Ran it for two days of agentic work on four 8 GB cards at PCIe Gen2 x4: better quality than the earlier GNmac recipe (which struggled with prefill and quality at times), handles complex work better, rated above GLM 5.3 Flash; staying on it. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @mountains1605, 2026-10-26 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake)/Confirmation 2 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake) | CurtisAccelerate | 2026-10-24 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | One user count / code / prose 122.8 / 90.3 / 62.4 tok/s; 8-user aggregate 168.7; cold prefill at 128K 1,558.7 tok/s. | Run on the same board as his own recipe: dual-socket Broadwell, 140 W per card, peer access off, so not the published 180 W / P2P conditions. Its prefill beat his own stack at every length. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: repo github.com/CurtisAccelerate/DeepSeekv41-Flash-1017-EXL3-CMP170HX by CurtisAccelerate on GitHub, posted by @anon33anon, 2026-10-20 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake)/Confirmation 3 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake) | darkmaniac7 | 2026-10-29 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | One user code 158, structured 136, prose 121 tok/s; 8 users 323 / 261 / 249; warm prefill 2,453 tok/s on a 17k prompt. Long-context copy test 0 of 29 paths wrong (1 wrong of 30 with the heretic patch). | Recipe 1.0.0 on four cards of an 8-card box with pqhaz's heretic patch written into the official shards, a miner co-resident (--gpu-memory-utilization 0.92), Engram on SSD, his own bench script. Tool calls work. Published speeds not reached. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-10-29 (lab notes) |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 8x 8 GB (Zanooda PP8)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 8x 8 GB (Zanooda PP8) | darkmaniac7 | 2026-10-27 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | 180 W: one user code 64 / structured 46 / prose 32 tok/s; 8 users 546 / 316 / 285 aggregate; prefill 5,478 tok/s (17k prompt). 150 W: 65 / 50 / 34; 533 / 296 / 284; prefill 5,276; 1M context, KV pool 5.56M tokens. | Eight cards at Gen2 x16 with P2P, Engram from disk (125 GB host RAM at the time), 1,024-token answers. Prefill, aggregate throughput, 1M context and image input match the author; single-stream decode is about half the author's 117 tok/s. The first run ended with the NVMe dropping off (see the page's warning). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-10-27 (lab notes) |
| Driver unlock/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Driver unlock | 68x0 | 2026-10-04 | both | Reproduced | Live on the master branch, confirmed working after Amogh's v0.5 release. | 68x reproduced the v0.5 unlock on master the same evening it was released, independently of the maintainer (@_j3ns). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @68x0, 2026-10-04 |
| ECC/Confirmation 1 (edit) | ECC | 68x0 | 2026-10-04 | both | Reproduced | ECC live on the master branch; a separate 8 GB card ran v0.5 master with ECC for ~25 h, memtest clean, 0 ECC errors. | Amogh announced software ECC; 68x confirmed it live on master the same evening, and MistyAshHole ran "v0.5 master w/ ECC" clean for about 25 hours (64 GB, memtest clean, ECC 0). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @68x0, 2026-10-04 |
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Fans and ducts | c133 | 2026-10-09 | Reproduced | 80 mm Supermicro FAN-0074L4, one per pair, never above 63 C at a 185 W cap | Confirms one fan per pair of cards (first reported by @cibernox ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @cibernox, 2026-10-07): two Supermicro FAN-0074L4 fans, one per pair of cards, taped with VHB straight onto the card ends with no duct, running inference with 1M-token contexts. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @c133, 2026-10-09 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 2 (edit) | Fans and ducts | analyticeth | 2026-10-07 | Reproduced | one 120 mm fan for two cards and one 140 mm fan for three cards, no temperature issues | Confirms one fan per pair of cards (first reported by @cibernox ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @cibernox, 2026-10-07) with a printed shroud. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @analyticeth, 2026-10-07 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 3 (edit) | Fans and ducts | froggao | 2026-10-26 | Reproduced | two S12038-4K per card in push-pull plus three case intake fans; no temperatures posted; "hear basically nothing" | Confirms Arctic S12038-4K fans in push-pull as a quiet, effective setup (first reported by @wakeupmbrc1 at 300 W, 3,500 rpm, HBM 72 C ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @wakeupmbrc1, 2026-10-16). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @froggao, 2026-10-26 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 4 (edit) | Fans and ducts | alanoo | 2026-10-26 | Partly reproduced | S12038-4K push only, four cards at a 200 W cap, at most 62 C in a cold garage | Same fans as the push-pull report by @wakeupmbrc1 ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @wakeupmbrc1, 2026-10-16, but push only; @wakeupmbrc1 replied that adding pull fans lets it run quieter and cooler. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000008-QINU`"'?Source: @alanoo, 2026-10-26 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 5 (edit) | Fans and ducts | forte9000 | 2026-10-08 | Reproduced | no numbers posted | Confirms the Printables 1801425 intake plenum by @turbine (first shown in use by @djpandaman ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @djpandaman, 2026-10-08): "i use the same one. it's fantastic." ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @forte9000, 2026-10-08 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 6 (edit) | Fans and ducts | mountains1605 | 2026-10-08 | Reproduced | two S12038-4K for four cards at about half speed all day; above 2,000 rpm only under sustained agentic load | Confirms the plenum and that S12038-4K fans are enough on it for inference (first reported by @reala7096 ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @reala7096, 2026-10-08). He uses his own horizontal remix of the plenum. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @mountains1605, 2026-10-08 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 7 (edit) | Fans and ducts | globalapathy | 2026-10-16 | Reproduced | about $11, per-port PWM | Confirms the 10-port ARCTIC fan hub first listed by @68x0 ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @68x0, 2026-10-16: "that's the fan hub I purchased, PWM per port control, ~$11". ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @globalapathy, 2026-10-16 |
|
| Fans and ducts/Confirmation 8 (edit) | Fans and ducts | moliminous | 2026-10-10 | Reproduced | five cards, average 33 to 37 C, quiet unless the fans run at 100 % | Confirms @port00 (RazK)'s integrated fan housing (Thingiverse 7409424 by PluraliT, updated on Cults3D), first reported in use by @68x0 at 60 C and 200 W ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @68x0, 2026-10-15. @moliminous used the Cults3D version unmodified on a 5-GPU PCIe switch board. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @moliminous, 2026-10-10 |
|
| Full SM unlock/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Full SM unlock | ghostinthedatacenter_87281 | 2026-10-19 | 10 GB | Reproduced | 128 SM on a 10 GB card, shown in screenshots (the posts carry no SM number in text); started from 170hx-rir-tool. | mrpandagod and lxwx established the 10 GB SM unlock; GhostInTheDatacenter reproduced it ("Finally!!!" with a screenshot on 2026-10-19, a second screenshot on 2026-10-26), as did orrorin and Waypoint. The route through the RIR burn is 68x0's line ("You can unlock more SMs with the RIR burn"), which GhostInTheDatacenter confirmed ("Exactly"). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000008-QINU`"'?Source: @ghostinthedatacenter_87281, 2026-10-19 |
| Gigabyte G292-Z20/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Gigabyte G292-Z20 | cmdrwaka324 | 2026-10-26 | Reproduced | 5 CMP 170HX with 2x RTX 3090 and an Intel B60 in one G292-Z20 | Runs his cards in the same server; good BIOS and out-of-band management, cards stay cool with an aggressive fan tune; each GPU pair on its own switch. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @cmdrwaka324, 2026-10-26 |
|
| Gigabyte G292-Z20/Confirmation 2 (edit) | Gigabyte G292-Z20 | danske1 | 2026-10-26 | Reproduced | "I got this too, it's great", with two caveats: ear-piercing stock fans, and EPS-to-EPS cables are needed because adapters do not fit in the back section. Card count not stated in his message. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000004-QINU`"'?Source: @danske1, 2026-10-26 |
||
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 2x 8 GB (ExLlamaV3 layer split)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 2x 8 GB (ExLlamaV3 layer split) | nestaa51 | 2026-10-09 | 8 GB | Reproduced | 96.2 tok/s on easy text, 34.2 tok/s on hard text (decode, one request). Prefill 2 to 5% slower than his TP build. | Run on two x16-modded 8 GB cards (Threadripper 3970X host) as the baseline for his tensor-parallel extension of this repo, which was 28% faster. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: repo github.com/alexvnesta/glm53-flash-cmp170hx-tp by alexvnesta on GitHub, posted by @nestaa51, 2026-10-12 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB/Confirmation 1 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB | cibernox | 2026-10-13 | 8 GB | Reproduced | Over 350 tok/s in short bursts, 270+ tok/s on real workflows (TP4). About 800 tok/s aggregate across agents (2026-10-19). KV pool 1,204,813 tokens at 262,144 per request (startup log). | Daily driver. Cards with the x16 mod, P2P enabled, TP4. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @cibernox, 2026-10-13 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB/Confirmation 2 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB | turbine | 2026-10-27 | 8 GB | Reproduced | 317 tok/s at batch 1 on code, 164 on prose. | Four cards, tensor parallel. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @turbine, 2026-10-27 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB/Confirmation 3 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB | mountains1605 | 2026-10-08 | 8 GB | Reproduced | PP4: 90 to 140 tok/s decode, 1M context window, prefill around 3k tok/s (2026-10-04). 340 tok/s total at 8 concurrent on real agent work (2026-10-08). | Four 8 GB cards on PCIe Gen2 x4 links (no x16 mod), PP4 layout. These are the field numbers for PP4 on x4 links, which the recipe itself has not measured. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @mountains1605, 2026-10-04 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB/Confirmation 4 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB | ikyo | 2026-10-06 | 8 GB | Reproduced | Concurrency 1: 161.8 tok/s per user. 2: 231.0 aggregate. 4: 307.5 aggregate. 8: 296.1 aggregate, 4.55 s median TTFT. One user by workload: structured 182.1, code 161.8, prose 141.2 (768-token answers, reasoning counted as output). | First run on a new 4-card box through Docker, on an early release Morrowmake said had bugs (a fix followed the same night). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @ikyo, 2026-10-06 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB/Confirmation 5 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB | 1a2b3c0967 | 2026-10-04 | 8 GB | Reproduced | Release 1.7, PP4, concurrency 3, 1M context, KV pool about 3M tokens: over 75 tok/s on prose. | Dropped --max-num-seqs from 8 to 3 to grow the KV pool. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @1a2b3c0967, 2026-10-04 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB/Confirmation 6 (edit) | GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB | darkmaniac7 | 2026-10-19 | 8 GB | Reproduced | Recipe 1.8.0 as published, MiaAI protocol, Gen2 x8, no P2P, 74 SMs, 180 W: PP4 one user 201 / 149 / 97 tok/s (structured / code / prose), 664 / 548 / 477 at eight users, 32k cold prefill 6,834-6,977 tok/s; TP4 361 / 284 / 199, 697 / 587 / 529 at eight users, prefill 1,633-1,753. On an 8-card box at Gen2 x16 with P2P (abliterated W4A16 checkpoint, own bench with 1,024-token answers, code / structured / prose): TP4 252 / 235 / 139, 623 / 617 / 421 at eight users, prefill 1.7k. | PP4 reproduces the published numbers closely; TP4 lands at about 0.75x without x16 links and P2P, because the all-reduce runs through host memory. Draft acceptance matched the published regime. Vision and video worked. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-10-19 (lab notes) |
| GLM 5.3 on 8x 8 GB (vllm-170hx-glm5)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | GLM 5.3 on 8x 8 GB (vllm-170hx-glm5) | 1a2b3c0967 | 2026-10-08 | 8 GB | Reproduced | 8 cards, concurrency 1, KV pool 850k tokens. No tok/s posted; "big performance bump" over his own 8-card build (about 25 tok/s, see GLM 5.3 on 8x 8 GB (Int4-Int8Mix PP8)). | The build first targeted PP10 and would not run at PP8 for him; it ran once reala added PP8, PP9 and PP10 support the same day. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @1a2b3c0967, 2026-10-08 |
| Gpcprobe/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Gpcprobe | globalapathy | 2026-10-20 | Reproduced | one good card in the batch he checked | @globalapathy used @matstatman's probe tools the day |
|
| P2P/Confirmation 1 (edit) | P2P | ghostinthedatacenter_87281 | 2026-10-07 | both | Reproduced | Applied curiouspixel's P2P patch (Morrowmake fork); P2P worked, same as Trust Inter's result. | Trust Inter reported curiouspixel's patch in Morrowmake/cmpunlocker fixed his P2P; GhostInTheDatacenter applied the same and got the same result ("Yep I did the same"). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @ghostinthedatacenter_87281, 2026-10-07 |
| PCIe Gen3 on the 10 GB card/Confirmation 1 (edit) | PCIe Gen3 on the 10 GB card | djpandaman | 2026-10-11 | 10 GB | Reproduced | Gen3 and Gen4 established on 10 GB cards via RIR; Gen4 validated behind a PLX switch. | lxwx first reported Gen3 working on a 10 GB card (2026-10-12); mrpandagod reports independently doing both 3.0 and 4.0 on 10 GB cards through the RIR route, and evanrodgers validated Gen3 x4 at boot on two cards with a clean 30-minute stress run. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @djpandaman, 2026-10-11 |
| PCIe x16 capacitor mod/Confirmation 1 (edit) | PCIe x16 capacitor mod | anon33anon | 2026-10-15 | Reproduced | Three cards modded: the first two trained x16; the third trained x8 until the suspect caps were redone, then x16. | Amogh documented x4 to x16 first (170th Street, April 2026); anon33anon reproduced it on his own cards. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @anon33anon, 2026-10-15 |
|
| Power supplies and cabling/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Power supplies and cabling | civiloid | 2026-10-15 | Reproduced | PCIe 8-pin 150 W, EPS 235 W | Confirms that the card has one EPS12V input and draws through both inputs of the PCIe-to-EPS adapter (first stated by @reala7096 ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @reala7096, 2026-10-15). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @civiloid, 2026-10-15 |
|
| Power supplies and cabling/Confirmation 2 (edit) | Power supplies and cabling | ropuls | 2026-10-09 | Reproduced | works with the latch clips trimmed on a bandsaw | Confirms that a CPU (EPS12V) cable straight from the PSU powers the card (first reported by @analyticeth ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @analyticeth, 2026-10-09). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @ropuls, 2026-10-09 |
|
| Power supplies and cabling/Confirmation 3 (edit) | Power supplies and cabling | n2dcrypt | 2026-10-05 | Reproduced | eight cards on two 1,600 W PSUs, no shutdowns | Confirms about four cards per 1,600 W PSU (first reported by @okrasit., four cards at a 300 W cap on one 1,600 W PSU ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @okrasit., 2026-10-05). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @n2dcrypt, 2026-10-05 |
|
| Qwen3.8 27B on 1x 8 GB (W4A16 vLLM)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Qwen3.8 27B on 1x 8 GB (W4A16 vLLM) | chonsworth | 2026-10-05 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | About 3.7k tok/s prefill at about 100 tok/s decode, against the published 1.9k / 100. Never run to 1M context. | Replying to kellertreppe123's post of the recipe, on the same model on one card. He did not say whether he used the recipe as written; his prefill is higher than published and his decode matches. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @chonsworth, 2026-10-05 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1x 8 GB (iIIusi0n SSD PLE)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1x 8 GB (iIIusi0n SSD PLE) | tekkenz | 2026-10-06 | 8 GB | Reproduced | Prefill 3.5k tok/s with a 2,048-token chunk size. | Served klee100/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-AutoRound-3bpw-MTP with this patched vLLM; had to set MTP=3. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000006-QINU`"'?Source: @tekkenz, 2026-10-06 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1x 8 GB (iIIusi0n SSD PLE)/Confirmation 2 (edit) | Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1x 8 GB (iIIusi0n SSD PLE) | dottoreargus | 2026-10-07 | 8 GB | Reproduced | 5K+ tok/s prefill on a single 8 GB card after tuning. | Changes on top of the repo: prefill batch 2,048 to 4,096, MTP draft tokens 1 to 2, PLE row cache 512 to 8,192 MiB, PLE AIO queue depth 256 to 512; NDIV 67, +250 MHz core offset, 200 W. He warns measurement differences may explain part of the gap. Used for one to two weeks of reverse-engineering work without issues. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @dottoreargus, 2026-10-07 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1x 8 GB (iIIusi0n SSD PLE)/Confirmation 3 (edit) | Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1x 8 GB (iIIusi0n SSD PLE) | hogg7701 | 2026-10-07 | 8 GB | Reproduced | 3K+ tok/s prefill on a single card. | Stock repo settings. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @hogg7701, 2026-10-07 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 2x 8 GB (ElectroHobo W4A16 TP2)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 2x 8 GB (ElectroHobo W4A16 TP2) | darkmaniac7 | 2026-10-28 | 8 GB | Reproduced | One user code 263, structured 266, prose 215 tok/s; 8 users 916 / 961 / 729; prefill 4.6k tok/s on a 17k prompt; 53% draft acceptance. Four instances on 8 cards: 3,617 / 3,316 / 2,664 tok/s aggregate at 32 users, 17.4k tok/s prefill. | Release 0.2.0 on Gen2 x16 cards with P2P, 1,024-token answers at temperature 0. Vision works. Four instances share one 48 GiB table through PLE_SHARED_DIR on tmpfs (77 GiB host RAM for all four); each keeps 90 to 100% of its lone speed. Custom all-reduce off cost 17 to 25% single-stream, so it stays on. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-10-28 (lab notes) |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 2x 8 GB (Plean PP2)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 2x 8 GB (Plean PP2) | galygious | 2026-10-08 | 8 GB | Partly reproduced | No tok/s posted. | Reproduced the setup "almost identically" on a Proxmox host and added the huihui abliteration. Entered as partly reproduced because no numbers were posted. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @galygious, 2026-10-08 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 3x 8 GB (clee PP3)/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 3x 8 GB (clee PP3) | 68x0 | 2026-10-08 | 8 GB | Reproduced | 52 to 60 tok/s on a single-user agentic workload on 3 cards (2026-10-08). Later about 90 tok/s on 3 cards and 100 to 110 on 2 cards with MTP (2026-10-09 to 10-11). | Three unlocked 8 GB cards, pulled the author's branch. Later runs used an uncensored model variant to get MTP working (MTP 1 token) and moved to 2 cards with the persistent NVMe KV cache, freeing the third card; prefill only slightly lower on 2 cards. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000008-QINU`"'?Source: @68x0, 2026-10-08 |
| RIR fuse burn/Confirmation 1 (edit) | RIR fuse burn | lxtend | 2026-10-11 | 10 GB | Reproduced | Burned 0x00150095 on a second card; it unlocks the disable_sw_override fuse. | orrorin proposed the record pair and Petri Krohn completed the plan; lxwx then burned 0x00150095 on his own 10 GB card and confirmed it clears the gate ("0x00150095 is right ... it does unlock the disable_sw_override fuse"). Reproduced again later by GhostInTheDatacenter, orrorin and Lycorascence with 170hx-rir-tool. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @lxtend, 2026-10-11 |
| Supermicro SYS-4028GR-TRT2/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Supermicro SYS-4028GR-TRT2 | nathang6866 | 2026-10-19 | Reproduced | 2 PLX switches, 5 PCIe slots each, all on CPU1 | Has the same server (4028GR-TRT with the X10DRG-O-PCIE board) and confirms two PLX chips with five slots each; advises keeping cards behind the same switch in consecutive slots. Confirms the topology, not a performance result. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @nathang6866, 2026-10-19 |
|
| Thermal limits/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Thermal limits | programmerboi | 2026-10-25 | Reproduced | passive card dropped out of nvidia-smi at 85 C idle (2026-10-16); a new card clocked out in under 5 minutes without cooling (2026-10-25) | Confirms that a card without forced airflow overheats and drops out even at idle (first reported by @analyticeth, off the bus at 95 C ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @analyticeth, 2026-10-07). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @programmerboi, 2026-10-16 |
|
| Undervolting and power limits/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Undervolting and power limits | cibernox | 2026-10-07 | Reproduced | offset +250 to +150 on one card; gibberish once or twice a day stopped | Confirms that a too-deep undervolt causes errors that a smaller offset removes (first reported by @ichundes, Xid 48/172/13 gone after lowering the offset by 50 ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @ichundes, 2026-10-07). Both had passed 170tune's stability tests. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @cibernox, 2026-10-07 |
|
| Undervolting and power limits/Confirmation 2 (edit) | Undervolting and power limits | fnerdman | 2026-10-14 | Reproduced | NDIV 70: +3 to 4 % token generation on Qwen 3.8 27B | Confirms NDIV 70 as a working HBM clock (first reported by @alanoo, four cards at NDIV 70, 74 fails ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @alanoo, 2026-10-14). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @fnerdman, 2026-10-14 |
|
| Undervolting and power limits/Confirmation 3 (edit) | Undervolting and power limits | wakeupmbrc1 | 2026-10-14 | Reproduced | NDIV 54 to 70: +10.5 % at one stream on Qwen 3.8 27B | Confirms NDIV 70 as a working HBM clock (first reported by @alanoo ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @alanoo, 2026-10-14); Hynix memory usually goes from 54 to 68 to 70. ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @wakeupmbrc1, 2026-10-12 |
|
| Water cooling/Confirmation 1 (edit) | Water cooling | djpandaman | 2026-10-09 | Reproduced | eight cards in Bykski 40G blocks; no temperatures posted | Confirms that the Bykski N-TESLA-A100-40G-SR block fits the CMP 170HX (first reported installed by @lia_oc ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @lia_oc, 2026-10-10): "i have 8 of the new bykski 40G waterblocks" ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000009-QINU`"'?Source: @djpandaman, 2026-10-08, "yes. they're the ideal block" ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-0000000A-QINU`"'?Source: @djpandaman, 2026-10-09, "my first one has 8 170hx cards in water blocks" ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-0000000B-QINU`"'?Source: @djpandaman, 2026-10-09. |
|
| Water cooling/Confirmation 2 (edit) | Water cooling | globalapathy | 2026-10-18 | Reproduced | two dual-card AIOs with 480 mm radiators, three of four cards running (one card arrived dead); no temperatures posted | Confirms dual-card AIO water coolers on the CMP 170HX (first reported by @civiloid, four cards "cool and quiet" ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @civiloid, 2026-10-16). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @globalapathy, 2026-10-18 |
|
| Water cooling/Confirmation 3 (edit) | Water cooling | _syn_thetic_ | 2026-10-22 | Reproduced | many pads missing; the worst paste he had seen | Confirms that used cards are dirty inside with pads missing or failing (first reported by @civiloid ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @civiloid, 2026-10-11). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @_syn_thetic_, 2026-10-22 |
|
| Water cooling/Confirmation 4 (edit) | Water cooling | gnasherrr | 2026-10-25 | Reproduced | stock paste rock hard; dental picks needed | Confirms the state of stock paste on used cards (first reported by @civiloid ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000005-QINU`"'?Source: @civiloid, 2026-10-11). ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000007-QINU`"'?Source: @gnasherrr, 2026-10-25 |