Mistral Large 4 on 8x 8 GB (llama.cpp lab trial)
More actions
| Reported 8 x 8 GB | |
| Quant | unsloth UD-IQ3_XXS GGUF (394 GiB in 10 files); DSpark drafter Q8_0 (2.1 GB) |
|---|---|
| Engine | llama.cpp llama-server, built in a CUDA 12.9 container llama.cpp master a91eab6 (2026-10-31), model support from PR #31376 |
| Topology | Layer split over all eight cards (tensor split is not available for this architecture) |
| Links | P2P on (whether it is needed is not stated) |
| Context | 196,608 (one unified KV pool, 8 slots) |
| Decode, 1 user | 18.7 tok/s |
| Decode, many users | 34.1 tok/s total, 8 users |
| Prefill | 131 tok/s at 17k tokens |
| Speculative decoding | DSpark (Q8_0 drafter), 3 draft tokens per step |
| Measured as | lab bench, short prompts, 1,024-token replies, reasoning effort low, code row |
| VRAM per card | 54 to 63 GiB of 64 used |
| Power cap | 250 to 300 W (governor), +160 MHz offset |
| Driver | 615.71.09 with cmpunlocker |
| Unlock build | cmpunlocker (64 GiB, 74 SMs) |
| Flags | -ngl 999 -sm layer -c 196608 -np 8 -kvu --spec-type draft-dspark -md (DSpark Q8_0) --reasoning-format deepseek; built with GGML_CUDA_FORCE_CUBLAS |
| Tested | @darkmaniac7 on 2026-11-01 |
| Source | link |
| Confirmations | None yet. |
Mistral Large 4 ("Le Chonk", 1T total, about 52B active) runs on eight 64 GB cards with llama.cpp, but only as a trial: it works, and it is far too slow for chat at long contexts. The model is 72 layers with DeepSeek-style compressed attention (MLA, KV rank 512) plus a DSA sparse indexer, cross-layer KV sharing, and 128 routed experts with 4 active and 1 shared. llama.cpp supports it since PR #31376, together with its DSpark drafter, but runs it with a layer split, so each token passes through the eight cards one after another. A real recipe (tensor-parallel vLLM with an Ampere-servable quant) does not exist yet; see #What would make it usable. Reported Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-11-01 (lab notes)
Prerequisites
- Eight unlocked 64 GB cards. UD-IQ3_XXS is 394 GiB of weights; with 196,608 tokens of KV the cards held 54 to 63 GiB each, the first card the most.
- About 400 GiB of disk for the GGUF, the drafter and the vision projector (3.3 GB, optional).
- Host RAM at least the size of the model, or load with
--no-mmap: with 377 GB of RAM and the GGUF on a SATA SSD, the memory-mapped load thrashed the page cache and took 57 minutes. Copying the GGUF to an NVMe first is the other fix. - Docker with the NVIDIA runtime (the build container keeps the host toolchain untouched).
Steps
Download the ten UD-IQ3_XXS files and the drafter from
unsloth/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-GGUF and check each
against its sha256 on Hugging Face. Then build llama.cpp for sm_80 in a CUDA devel container:
git clone --depth 50 https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp && cd llama.cpp
docker run --rm -v "$PWD":/src -w /src nvidia/cuda:12.9.1-devel-ubuntu24.04 bash -c '
apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq cmake ninja-build git libssl-dev
cmake -S . -B build-cuda -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DGGML_CUDA=ON -DCMAKE_CUDA_ARCHITECTURES=80 \
-DGGML_CUDA_FORCE_CUBLAS=ON -DLLAMA_CURL=OFF -DGGML_NATIVE=ON \
-DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined
cmake --build build-cuda -j 24 --target llama-server llama-cli llama-bench'
The linker flag is needed because the build container has no GPU driver: the executables link against
libcuda.so.1, which the NVIDIA runtime provides when they run. Serve:
docker run -d --name le-chonk --runtime nvidia --gpus all --ipc host --network host --ulimit memlock=-1 \
-e CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID -e LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/src/build-cuda/bin \
-v "$PWD":/src:ro -v /path/to/gguf:/models:ro nvidia/cuda:12.9.1-devel-ubuntu24.04 \
/src/build-cuda/bin/llama-server -m /models/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-UD-IQ3_XXS-00001-of-00010.gguf \
-md /models/dspark-Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-Q8_0.gguf --spec-type draft-dspark -ngld 999 \
-ngl 999 -sm layer -c 196608 -np 8 -kvu -fa auto --jinja --reasoning-format deepseek \
--metrics --alias mistral-large-4 --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8090 -t 32
Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-11-01 (lab notes)
Measured numbers
The lab's chassis, 2026-11-01: eight 8 GB cards on the 300 W VBIOS with a +160 MHz offset, P2P on, the build above. Short prompts, 1,024 tokens per reply, reasoning effort low, tok/s decode per stream / total:
| 1 user | 4 users | 8 users | |
|---|---|---|---|
| structured | 18.0 / 17.7 | 5.7 / 21.9 | 4.1 / 30.5 |
| code | 18.7 / 16.9 | 5.9 / 22.8 | 4.5 / 34.1 |
| prose | 12.6 / 11.8 | 3.8 / 14.9 | 2.8 / 22.0 |
- Prefill 131 tok/s on a 17k-token prompt (130 s to the first token).
- At 73k to 77k tokens of context: 747 s to the first token (98 tok/s prefill), then 5.9 tok/s decode with one request; two requests together decoded 2.6 + 2.7 tok/s, no gain, and a cold prefill nearly stopped the other request's decode. A full roleplay-length turn (about 1,200 words with thinking) works out at 25 to 35 minutes.
- The DSpark drafter accepted 52 to 57 percent of its drafts (three per step), so drafting works; the base speed is the limit.
- For scale, the same short-prompt command on the same chassis: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake) does 147 / 219 / 144 tok/s for one user and GLM 5.3 Flash on four cards 266 / 284 / 157.
Reported Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-11-01 (lab notes)
Known issues
- The chat template accepts only
reasoning_effortlow, medium or high (high when absent) and raises an error for anything else, so clients that send "max" fail; send "high". - llama.cpp's tensor split (
-sm tensor) refuses this architecture: itsllm_arch_supports_sm_tensorexcludesmistral-large4and the other MLA and DSA families (deepseek2, deepseek32, glm_dsa). Layer split is the only multi-card mode. - Loading memory-mapped from a slow disk with less RAM than the model takes about an hour (see Prerequisites).
- Vision needs the separate
mmprojfile; this run was text only.
Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-11-01 (lab notes)
- On Discord, segmond set out to run Mistral Large 4 (1T) on twelve cards (asked how many, he answered "0xC", 12 in hexadecimal) and had GLM 5.3 set it up. After 5 hours it gave up: "I can't get this running, I need additional upstream support". Engine, quant and card variant were not stated. Five hours after that post, on 2026-11-01, he wrote: "looks like glm got Mistral working, 1.5tk/sec tho" ("Le chunk for real"), wishing he could "throw opus at it". So it runs on his rig at 1.5 tok/s, a first-light number and not a recipe: engine, quantization, card variant, card count (twelve were planned) and context are all unstated. Compare the lab's eight-card llama.cpp numbers above. Source: @segmond, 2026-10-31
Source: @segmond, 2026-10-31
Source: @1a2b3c0967, 2026-11-01
Source: @segmond, 2026-11-01
Source: @segmond, 2026-11-01
Source: @segmond, 2026-11-01
What would make it usable
- vLLM has supported Mistral Large 4 since its release (TP4 and TP8, expert parallel, the built-in DSpark drafter at about 2.9 accepted tokens per step for roughly 2x output on TP8). What is missing for these cards is a checkpoint vLLM can serve on Ampere at about 3 bits: the official weights are FP8 (about 1 TB, too big for 512 GiB) and NVFP4 (Blackwell only). An EXL3 or W4A16 build of the experts, as LibertAI's export does for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, would allow a Morrowmake-style recipe.
- A REAP expert-pruned 667B build exists in NVFP4 only; an Ampere quant of it would fit far more easily.
- A DFlash2-class drafter trained for this model.
- llama.cpp tensor split for the MLA / DSA attention family.
Source: repo github.com/vllm-project/vllm by vllm-project on GitHub Source: @darkmaniac7, 2026-11-01 (lab notes)
Related
- llama.cpp on CMP cards, Speculative decoding on the 170HX, Large rigs (8 or more cards), Engines.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 4x 8 GB (Morrowmake), GLM 5.3 Flash on 4x 8 GB.
- The release on Discord: segmond reported the "Le Chonk" weights on 2026-10-29, and GlobalApathy posted Mistral's announcement, Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk) is now open weight, on 10-30 ("This one is for the 10 carders"). segmond: with 52B active he expected about 15 tok/s (an estimate, not a measurement); on Mistral's chart it sits below DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiMo 2.6 Pro and above GLM 5.3 and K3, and its vision is an advantage over GLM 5.3. OB88594: the active parameter count is too large for local deployment. Source: @segmond, 2026-10-29
Source: @globalapathy, 2026-10-30
Source: @globalapathy, 2026-10-30
Source: @segmond, 2026-10-30
Source: @segmond, 2026-10-30
Source: @segmond, 2026-10-30
Source: @segmond, 2026-10-30
Source: @segmond, 2026-10-30
Source: @ob88594, 2026-10-30